These all look like sensible edits, thanks!

Based on previous issues, I suspect AOMedia will be reluctant to make any purely cosmetic changes to the AV1 spec (even when they are clear improvements), but very interested in making the corresponding improvements to the AV2 specification.

These seem to be all editorial. I see no issue in accepting them since they do not impact any implementation.

I see three sets of suggested editorial changes:

1. 0e347d7
2. 2fd82d1
3. ca995e1

All of them are editorial, so I do not see a problem in making these changes in the next edition of AV1 spec, and porting the same to AV2 spec.

Rereading the changes I am a bit concerned about the following text:

TotalDecodedLumaSampleRate is defined as the sum of the UpscaledWidth *
FrameHeight of all frames with show_existing_frame equal to 0 that belongs
to the temporal unit that belongs to the operating point, divided by the...

The verb "belong" has been changed to "belongs" in the suggested change. To my eyes the subject is "all frames". This is plural so in my opinion the verb should be conjugated as "belong" (as in the original text).

I agree with Peter. Also some of the suggestions do not appear to be the best (briefly checked on my phone and instead of saying “sizes of the matrix”, “matrix sizes” sounds way better to me. These need to be more carefully checked.